I have been shocked by
the appalling one-sidedness of discussions by men, mostly, concerning
rape going on in this country. The idea is often bandied around that
women could do themselves a favour by avoiding certain areas at night
or, get this, by dressing differently. Apart from the obvious attempt
at social control, there are deeper problems here. Some of this guff
comes from “normal” people and some from groups which are best
described as anti-feminist. I won't name them here but suffice it to
say they have a tendency for misplaced self-adulation. If you detect
I may disagree with them, well you thunk correctly.
My stance is
clear, rape is rape and is never acceptable. No exceptions, no
mitigating circumstances. It is the most vile form of physical and
mental abuse with devastating long-lasting effects.
Two of the most common
misconceptions about rape are behind the ugly rape-apology fallacy.
99% of all rapes are committed by men (some of these are against men
as well). And Statistics show that rapes are most often committed by
a man known to his victim.
So stranger-rapes are
rarer than people think. This should immediately raise a red flag and
tell you that a woman's ability to be able to significantly decrease
their chances of being raped by "toning down" what they
wear, is a myth. Most rapists would have been planning to rape
anyway, and what the victim is wearing makes no difference.
Even the authorities
who should already know this, fall into the same trap. This is
exactly why it is WRONG of the Police to use adverts saying "dress
like X to reduce the chances of being raped" and why it is RIGHT
for them to just say "No means No" or even “Only yes
means yes”. Compare these:
Bad:
http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/PwGi1v4ueSyvVlPaI.JrSg--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://l.yimg.com/os/251/2012/08/03/westmercia-03072012-jpg_095054.jpg
Wow to that last one,
by the way. Shocking.
Good:
http://www.hertssunflower.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Nobody-asks-to-be-Girls-Clubbing.jpg
Using a false
"risk-reduction" strategy like that first bad example just
alienates women. This advert was rightly widely criticised by the way
and I believe has now been withdrawn.
Compare this approach
to that for burglary for instance. It is sensible to use
risk-reduction strategies in this case, because burglary is a crime
of opportunity. So closing curtains, having locks and intruder alarms
can all help here. But this is entirely different from the crime of
rape.
Moreover, I find it
pathetic that men feel the need to be handled with "kid-gloves"
on this.
It gives the sick
impression that we have no control over our urges, that we are
slavering, leering dogs and that the slightest flash of skin can lead
to inevitable consequences which our not entirely our fault. Well
wouldn't that be convenient for men. "Don't make Hulk
angry!" I can hear being used, somewhere. We need to have our
consciousness raised, to rise up and be better than that.
The second
misconception, is that rape is about sexual gratification. It is
actually much more about male dominance, power and control.
This is obvious once
you accept the fact that in some parts of the world, rape is used as
a weapon to threaten women into compliance with male-determined
norms, or even as a punishment for certain "crimes". These
can include anything from not following a husband's instructions to
the letter to just being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Islamic tradition for
example strongly favours women covering up almost their entire skin,
yet in many Islamic countries they still have a terrible rape
problem.
Why? Exactly because
they have got it all wrong - rape is more about power, not sex.
Covering up does not reduce the need for pathetic male egos to be
seen to be in the position of power.
Succumbing to this
misconception results in the same vile victim-blaming rape-apology I
have heard people spouting in this country. Until men just get
over their massive egos, accept the fact that women can be just
as awesome as them, and start actually *using* their frontal lobes to
control their actions, I can't see this problem being resolved to any
substantial degree.
No comments:
Post a Comment