Today
I signed a petition aiming to support progress for women in
Afghanistan. They suffer hellish levels of abuse on a daily basis
including violence and rape, for which the chances of just punishment
for the perpetrators is very low compared to the Western world. The
petition calls for a fully funded and supported action plan for
women's rights in the country. This includes funding for shelters
and legal representation. Although things have undoubtedly improved
in the last decade, with the prospect of international troop
withdrawal next year, there is the risk the the Taliban will once
again be able to impose more of their malevolent will on the county's
poor citizens. This is a very important appeal. Please, you can help
here
http://www.nowomennopeace.org/index.php?option=com_rsform&formId=28#.UTr0n9FOp4F
But
I would have a clear conflict of interest here, some might say. Most
of the women I am helping here are Muslims. They are part of a
religion that commits some terrible atrocities the world over. They
are deluded in their thinking about the world around us and are
invested in a regressive belief system that moves basic human rights,
liberty and democracy back hundreds of years. Why should I help these
people when often, they either do not want to be helped or refuse to
help themselves? Western societies these days get accused of trying
to impose their western values and western beliefs on a rightfully
unwilling and unreceptive populace, who see our decadence as a
colossal sin. Some might say this, and they wouldn't necessarily be
wrong. We aren't likely to get anything back for this effort, so why
help?
I'll
tell you why. It's because social justice is more important than
people's beliefs or modes of thinking. I am a liberal secular
humanist first, then an atheist. My atheism does not define me, since
a lack of something is never really a defining characteristic. I help
because I can, and because it's the right thing to do. I do this with
the underlying belief that there is something of value in Western
society. Is it better? Probably, but that doesn't mean there isn't
value in Islamic societies, or nothing we can learn from them. But to
believe that Western society is no better is to give in to the
defeatist sentiment that all our efforts over the past couple of
hundred years with the privilege we have been given, have been for
nought. I find this difficult to accept, which relativists will find
hard to swallow. But treating women in a better way cannot really be
seen in a negative light, surely?
Some
atheists would say that increasing secularism is the best way to
ensure that societies become more progressive and improve women's
rights. Hence they espouse the promotion of atheism. But I think
there is a two-way causation effect at play. For me, increasing
social justice and improving women's rights within their existing
social and cultural structures will increase secularism, kicking off
a desirable positive feedback process. Afghan women have a vested
interest in more moderate and less radical forms of Islamism, and
this goes hand-in-hand with their increased rights. And while still
tough, it is patently easier to adopt the latter approach, as
wholesale changes of deep-seated beliefs and cultures will take a
long time.
We
can look at this as a top-down against bottom-up approach. The
top-down way is directly encouraging western values. This needs to be
done very carefully, if at all, due to the resistance we can expect.
The bottom-up example is funding, supporting and promoting women's
rights. This approach to "work from within" has a couple of
key advantages. It enables the progress that is made to be
attributable to the people it will be benefiting: it is their gain
for their work. This avoids the direct danger of "value
imposition" by the west, and the people working from within can
do so at their own pace. This is why the project I linked to above is
exactly such a good way of helping making Afghanistan a better place.
Men have had their chance with all the power, and frankly squandered
it. I trust women, and their superior empathy, to help their country
in the best ways possible to alleviate suffering in the short term,
and work towards the long-term goal of a future that creates less
suffering in the first place: an increasingly secular future.
No comments:
Post a Comment